Beamer-Schneider Professorship in Ethics

Navigation + Search

Beamer-Schneider Program in Ethics, Morals, and Civics



Post at the Butterfly Garden, Cudell Commons, Cleveland, 2016

Wilkinsburg, PA -the dynamics of de facto segregation, urban poverty, and gentrification

Students in Crafting Your Own Freedom, a first year seminar, The Botanical Gardens, Cleveland, 2017

The Beamer-Schneider Professorship was created to develop undergraduate ethics. Elmer G. Beamer was the accountant for Kent Hale Smith, and Hubert H. Schneider was Smith’s lawyer. At a time when there was a lot of corruption in Cleveland, both men were known for their integrity.

Cyrus Taylor, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, with Phil Ranney and Bill LaPlace of the Kent Smith Charitable Foundation, which funded this professorship, and Jeremy Bendik-Keymer, Beamer-Schneider Professor (2010 – ); four white guys

Overview of the function of the Beamer-Schneider Professorship

The Beamer-Schneider Professorship, as designed with its donors, has one aim:

1. To create universal undergraduate ethical learning while at Case Western Reserve University.

My interpretation of this ambitious aim involves two design decisions:

  • To interpret “universal” through one-degree of separation universality. This means that if every undergraduate has had or knows someone personally and well who has had a successful ethical learning program while here, then the environment as a whole can be said to involve deliberate ethical learning.
  • To interpret learning as recognizing Student Life, not simply Academic Life.

The underlying core idea here is ethos: an environment of character development.

Home of some books used in the Beamer-Schneider Professorship

Undergraduate Moral Education Advisory Committee of the Beamer-Schneider Professorship

Committee under construction; current members include:

Eric Chilton, Lecturer, SAGES and the Department of English, Case Western Reserve University

Matthew Garrett, Interim Director, UCITE and Associate Professor, Department of Music, Case Western Reserve University

Sarah Gridley, Associate Professor of English, Case Western Reserve University

Amie Jackson, Associate Director, Office of Greek Life, Case Western Reserve University

Peter Knox, Director, Baker Nord Center for the Humanities and Eric and Jane Nord Professor, Department of Classics, Case Western Reserve University

Lisa Nielson, Director, Flora Stone Mather Center for Women, Case Western Reserve University

Drew Poppleton, Associate Director for Employee Relations, Career Services Center, Case Western Reserve University

Suzanne Rivera, Vice President for Research and Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University

Liz Rocceforte, Director of the LGBT Center, Case Western Reserve University

Lou Stark, Vice President for Student Affairs, Case Western Reserve University

Lee Thompson, Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University

Mission goals (2015 statement)

As to the means that seem best to realize this aim, there are seven.

M1: SAGES has the explicit goal of developing undergraduate ethical decision-making. If SAGES fulfills its mission, then the lion’s share of the Beamer-Schneider Professorship’s mission will be done. Accordingly, the professorship must support SAGES systematically in any way that it can.

M2: The individual professional schools have profession-specific ethical requirements and some professors in Arts & Sciences serve professional ethics education in their programs or outside them. Accordingly, the Beamer-Schneider Professorship should support professional ethics teaching. Currently, I have been doing research on how to support the Case School of Engineering supported by the Office of the Provost.

M3: Student life has many different offices that support ethos–and most are explicit abut doing so already. Think here of Residential Life, Counseling, Greek Life, Student Government, among others. Consulting the Inamori Professor of Ethics, I am exploring ways to bring this ethos into synergy as a whole with the support our professorships already provide in part. The whole will be greater and more helpful than the sum of its parts.

M4: Undergraduate Studies shapes ethical learning in explicit and implicit ways, including shaping policies that involve ethical decisions and affect students. Accordingly, working with the Dean of Undergraduate Studies is important to the mission goal of the professorship. First Year Experience is important. Career Services are important. And so on. The Beamer-Schneider Professor should support undergraduate studies in any way that accords with the goal of ethical learning.

Is our education, including its terms and conditions, morally acceptable?

M5: While developing the organic and general coherence of undergraduate ethical learning at CWRU is important, also important is developing a site on campus where theoretically rigorous ethical learning occurs in a way that can be useful to other parts of campus. This can be found in the Department of Philosophy having developed an ethics minor already and in the idea of an ethics track in the major. For this means to be fully successful, the department should actively consider the total ethics offerings around the university, especially in the Department of Bioethics, and think seriously about finding ways to join our program with options that support the others. We do this currently through the one-outside-course option in the ethics minor.

M6: The ethos of CWRU should include a number of regular, public forums for discussing ethical issues with some depth or personalization greater than that found in the popular media. To this end, the Inamori Prize, the Ethics Table, and the Beamer-Schneider Lecture in Ethics and Civics stand as public signs of our university’s commitment to ethical learning. Eventually, finding a way to publicize these forums alongside the many others that discuss values would create a more coherent message to the community. Consider simply the Social Justice Institute’s many forums, the Friday Public Policy discussions, the Diversity Lecture Series, and programs by the LGBT Center or the Flora Stone Mather Center for Women.

M7: Finally, the aim of achieving one-degree-of-separation universality needs to be assessed periodically. A useful and easy survey mechanism should be developed to survey undergraduates across the university, at the least on exiting the university. This means can involve more qualitative work, too. Focus-groups to provide in-depth entrance-to-exit feedback on the topography of ethical learning here could be very useful for a number of reasons, including identifying potentials and overlooked areas.

Michael Rakowitz, 2015 Beamer-Schneider Lecturer in Ethics & Civics, with his evolving socially engaged art project on the right to safety, Guide to Kulchur, Lorain Ave., Cleveland, 2017

Looking over these 7 means to the professorship’s goals, the Ethics Table Fellows hold a transversal position. They do not map simply onto one means. This is for two reasons. First, the Fellows is a reinvention of a prior program, that of Bob Lawry, emeritus in the Law School. I think it is important to carry on successful institutional ideas. By developing the Ethics Table Fellows, the professorship continued Bob’s idea. Second, the Fellows are a general brain-trust for a number of the 7 means, a point of experimentation and learning that can reach out to different means at different times to free up connections or introduce new ideas. For instance, Fellows regularly teach in SAGES (M1); they have included members of Undergraduate Studies (M4) and Student Life (M3); they have included members of CSE (M2); they have pioneered some ethical assessment tools (M7). In addition, they reach out into areas of the university that are not explicitly tasked with undergraduate education but which shape our common university ethos–such as Research Management or the Law School.

The main aim of the Beamer-Schneider Professorship is ambitious. It requires the long game and depends upon a growing sense of team spirit. We can appreciate how it would help for there to be speed in the attainment of its aim. At the same time, patience is also important, given that the means of reaching the aim are complicated and involve many different offices, programs, and people. Everyone in our university community deserves a say in this ambitious goal that the university created in instituting the professorship.


Statement on the professorship’s goals following the 2016 Moral Development Study

True pragmatism:  concerns of the professorship following the September 2017 CUE report

Comment on CWRU’s revised Academic Integrity Policy (2018 version)

Democracy as relationship



Page last modified: February 20, 2018